NAAC

Criterion 1

1.1.1 The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well planned and documented process
1.1.2 The institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE
1.1.3 Teachers of the Institution participate in following activities related to curriculum development and assessment of the affiliating University and/are represented on the following academic bodies during the last five years
  • Academic council/BoS of Affiliating university
  • Setting of question papers for UG/PG programs
  • Design and Development of Curriculum for Add on/ certificate/ Diploma Courses
  • Assessment /evaluation process of the affiliating University
  • Options
  • All of the above
  • Any 3 of the above
  • Any 2 of the above
  • Any 1 of the above
  • None of the above
  • 1.2.1 Percentage of programs in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/elective course system has been implemented
    1.2.2 Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years
  • 1.2.2.1: How many Add on /Certificate programs are added within the last 5 years
  • 1.2.3 Average percentage of students enrolled in Add-on/Certificate programs as against the total number of students during the last five years
  • 1.2.3.1. Number of students enrolled in subject related Certificate or Add-on programs year wise during last five years
  • 1.3.1 Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum (10)
    1.3.2 Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship during last five years
  • 1.3.2.1: Number of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship year wise during last five years
  • * Supporting Document
    1.3.3 Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/internship (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 1.3.3.1. Number of students undertaking project work/field work /internships
  • * Supporting Document
    1.4.1 Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the following stakeholders 1) Students 2)Teachers 3)Employers 4)Alumni
  • Options
  • All of the above
  • Any 3 of the above
  • Any 2 of the above
  • Any 1 of the above
  • None of the above
  • * Supporting Document
    1.4.2 Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows:
  • Options:
  • A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website
  • B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken
  • C. Feedback collected and analysed
  • D. Feedback collected
  • E. Feedback not collected
  • * Supporting Document
    
    Admission 2024-25