6.1.1 | The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution |
* Supporting Document |
---|---|---|
6.1.2 | The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management. |
* Supporting Document |
6.2.1 | The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed |
* Supporting Document |
6.2.2 | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc |
* Supporting Document |
6.2.3 | Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above |
|
6.3.1 | The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff |
* Supporting Document |
6.3.2 | Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years |
|
6.3.3 | Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non-teaching staff during the last five years
|
|
6.3.4 | Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course etc.)
|
|
6.3.5 | Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff Describe the functioning status of the Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff |
* Supporting Document |
6.4.1 | Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly |
* Supporting Document |
6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)
|
|
6.4.3 | Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources |
* Supporting Document |
6.5.1 | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes |
* Supporting Document |
6.5.2 | The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities ( For first cycle - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality For second and subsequent cycles - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives ) |
* Supporting Document |
6.5.3 | Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s) 3. Participation in NIRF 4. any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA) Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template Quality initiatives • AQARs prepared/ submitted • Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) • Participation in NIRF • Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA) |
* Supporting Document |