NAAC

Criterion 1

1.1.1 The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well planned and documented process * Supporting-Documents
1.1.2 The institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE * Supporting-Documents
1.1.3 Teachers of the Institution participate in following activities related to curriculum development and assessment of the affiliating University and/are represented on the following academic bodies during the last five years
  • Academic council/BoS of Affiliating university
  • Setting of question papers for UG/PG programs
  • Design and Development of Curriculum for Add on/ certificate/ Diploma Courses
  • Assessment /evaluation process of the affiliating University
  • Options
  • All of the above
  • Any 3 of the above
  • Any 2 of the above
  • Any 1 of the above
  • None of the above
  • 1.2.1 Percentage of programs in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/elective course system has been implemented
    1.2.2 Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years
  • 1.2.2.1: How many Add on /Certificate programs are added within the last 5 years
  • 1.2.3 Average percentage of students enrolled in Add-on/Certificate programs as against the total number of students during the last five years
  • 1.2.3.1. Number of students enrolled in subject related Certificate or Add-on programs year wise during last five years
  • 1.3.1 Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum (10)
    1.3.2 Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship during last five years
  • 1.3.2.1: Number of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship year wise during last five years
  • * Supporting-Documents
    1.3.3 Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/internship (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 1.3.3.1. Number of students undertaking project work/field work /internships
  • * Supporting-Documents
    1.4.1 Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the following stakeholders 1) Students 2)Teachers 3)Employers 4)Alumni
  • Options
  • All of the above
  • Any 3 of the above
  • Any 2 of the above
  • Any 1 of the above
  • None of the above
  • * Supporting-Documents
    1.4.2 Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows:
  • Options:
  • A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website
  • B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken
  • C. Feedback collected and analysed
  • D. Feedback collected
  • E. Feedback not collected
  • * Supporting-Documents
    
    Admission 2024-25